American Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation
E-ISSN: XXXX-XXXX
•
Impact Factor: -
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AJAMRI
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Explainable AI in High-Stakes Decision Making: Building Transparency, Accountability and Public Trust
| Author(s) | Eric von Hippel |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Abstract | Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being deployed in high-stakes environments such as healthcare, financial services, criminal justice, employment, insurance, public administration, and critical infrastructure. While AI systems can improve prediction, efficiency, and decision consistency, their use in consequential settings raises concerns regarding opacity, bias, accountability, privacy, and public trust. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged as an important approach for addressing these concerns by providing information about how AI systems generate predictions or recommendations. This study examines the role of explainable AI in high-stakes decision making, with particular emphasis on transparency, accountability, and public trust. A qualitative and conceptual methodology based on secondary literature is adopted to analyse different approaches to explainability, including interpretable models, feature attribution, counterfactual explanations, example-based explanations, and human-in-the-loop oversight. The study proposes an integrated framework in which technical explainability is combined with procedural accountability, institutional governance, human oversight, and stakeholder communication. The analysis suggests that explanations can improve understanding and contestability, but explainability alone cannot guarantee fairness or trustworthy AI. Excessively complex explanations may also create false confidence or fail to address underlying biases. Effective governance therefore requires a broader approach incorporating documentation, auditing, impact assessment, monitoring, appeal mechanisms, data governance, and clearly assigned responsibility. The study concludes that explainable AI should be understood not merely as a technical feature but as a component of responsible decision-making architecture. In high-stakes environments, meaningful transparency must enable affected stakeholders to understand, question, and appropriately challenge AI-supported decisions. |
| Keywords | Explainable Artificial Intelligence, High-Stakes Decision Making, Transparency, Accountability, Public Trust, AI Governance, Algorithmic Fairness, Human Oversight, Responsible AI, Artificial Intelligence. |
| Field | Engineering |
| Published In | Volume 5, Issue 4, July-August 2023 |
| Published On | 2023-07-19 |
Share this

E-ISSN XXXX-XXXXCrossRef DOI prefix of AJAMRI is 10.00000/AJAMRI
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.